Forum
It will be very helpful to those reading your comment if you have altered your Forum signature to include your Science specialism, your number of years of teaching experience and any post of responsibility that you hold. Click here and then select My Profile to do this now.
Note: In order to encourage participation, some of the forums below have been opened to non-members of this site. This policy will be reviewed in the light of inappropriate or non-constructive posts.
Opinion
What do Science teachers think about their curriculum?
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
Choose a statement from those offered here. Do you agree or disagree with it? To what extent and why? If you do agree, is the described situation good or bad? Could it be made better? How?
(OPEN FORUM: NON-MEMBERS MAY POST) | 7 | 18 | by  Gary Dale (guest)09 May 2013 17:44Jump! |
What if...?
(OPEN FORUM: NON-MEMBERS MAY POST) | 1 | 0 | |
On 4 December 2009, Ofqual published new criteria for the awarding bodies to base their specifications on (for first teaching in September 2011). Click the "2011" link, above, for details. What do you think of them? (OPEN FORUM: NON-MEMBERS MAY POST) | 0 | 0 | |
Voice your opinion your own way -- but please make sure all criticism is constructive and in touch with reality! This is not a place to just moan. | 0 | 0 |
Changing the curriculum
How can teachers alter the curriculum from within?
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
Will individual Science departments incorporate the 'something better' ideas of this site? If not, what can be done to encourage them? Or, if so, is it enough? | 1 | 6 | by 10 Oct 2009 21:31Jump! |
What can or should be done to bring the ideas of this site to national attention -- government, awarding bodies, teachers, parents, press...? | 0 | 0 |
Contributing to the curriculum
Tweaks, ideas, suggestions to make the current Science curriculum better.
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
This thread is "public" -- non-members may post. | 2 | 6 | by  Mike Bell (guest)23 Jan 2010 10:19Jump! |
| 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 | ||
| 0 | 0 |
An eye on awarding bodies
Allowing the past to inform the future...
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
Praiseworthy or irksome qualities of specifications and examinations provided by AQA. | 0 | 0 | |
Praiseworthy or irksome qualities of specifications and examinations provided by OCR. | 0 | 0 | |
Praiseworthy or irksome qualities of specifications and examinations provided by Edexcel. | 1 | 1 | by 27 Sep 2009 20:00Jump! |
Praiseworthy or irksome qualities of specifications and examinations provided by WJEC. | 0 | 0 |
General discussion around Science education
For discussing things that don't seem to fit anywhere else!
| Category name | Threads | Posts | Last post |
What would you like to talk about today? | 1 | 1 | by 13 Jan 2010 21:38Jump! |
RSS: New threads | New posts